Hi *|FNAME|*,

One of the things I find most interesting about the IMS is the range of ways organisations apply the thinking.

Although Investment Logic Mapping is often associated with individual business cases, the same disciplined line of enquiry can also support:

investment planning and prioritisation;
policy and program development;
portfolio discussions;
early project shaping;
Benefits definition and tracking; and
investment assurance and review.

At program level, for example, the IMS can help establish a common view of the major Problems an organisation or portfolio needs to address, the Benefits and KPIs that define the value sought, and the strategic direction future investments should support.

Individual initiatives can then be shaped and prioritised against that common logic.

I’d be interested to hear how you have been using the IMS since the course. Feel free to reply and let me know what has worked well — or where you have found the practice more difficult.

I have also added some examples of broader IMS application to the Participant Resource Hub.

[Explore broader applications of the IMS]

If your organisation is considering how to build more consistent investment capability across a team or program, I am always happy to have a conversation about what that could look like.

Kind regards,
Eldar

 
Warm regards,
Eldar Salkovic
Director,
Official ILM Training Provider across Australia & New Zealand

DTF-approved | NZ Treasury-aligned
https://facilitatortraining.com.au
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eldarsalkovic/

 

 

This email is intended for *|USEREMAIL|*
If you no longer wish to receive these emails you can Unsubscribe
Copyright 2025